1965 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 2 (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 2 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW Munga | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | Munga | 2 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 45 L |