1965 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Equator (152 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DKW Munga weights approximately 135 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Equator.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Suzuki Equator. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW Munga | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | DKW | Suzuki |
| Model | Munga | Equator |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 80 L |
