1965 DKW Munga vs. 2011 Mazda 6
To start off, 2011 Mazda 6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 6 (272 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 6 weights approximately 499 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW Munga | 2011 Mazda 6 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | Munga | 6 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 272 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |