1965 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (285 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 752 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW Munga | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | DKW | Jeep |
Model | Munga | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 285 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1862 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3881 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1826 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2423 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |