1965 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2012 Nissan Juke is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Juke is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Juke (188 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Juke weights approximately 211 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW Munga | 2012 Nissan Juke | |
Make | DKW | Nissan |
Model | Munga | Juke |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1321 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |