1965 DKW Munga vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 723 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW Munga | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | DKW | Cadillac |
Model | Munga | CTS |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11.7 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1833 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |