1965 DKW Munga vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (365 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 322 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 819 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW Munga | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
| Make | DKW | Dodge |
| Model | Munga | CHARGER |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 365 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1929 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5077 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1482 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3052 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 72 L |
