1965 DKW Munga vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1004 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW Munga | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | DKW | Jeep |
| Model | Munga | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 286 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2114 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4821 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2154 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1763 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2916 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 93 L |
