1965 DKW Munga vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (511 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 468 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 835 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW Munga | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | DKW | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Munga | E |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 511 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4913 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2100 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2874 mm |