1965 Ferrari 512 F1 vs. 1950 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 (223 HP @ 12000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 620 kg more than 1965 Ferrari 512 F1.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ferrari 512 F1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 | 1950 Jeep CJ3A | |
| Make | Ferrari | Jeep |
| Model | 512 F1 | CJ3A |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 12000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 490 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 700 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 770 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2040 mm |
