1965 Ferrari 512 F1 vs. 2003 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2003 Smart ForTwo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ferrari 512 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 would be higher. At 1,496 cc (12 cylinders), 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 (223 HP @ 12000 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 2003 Smart ForTwo. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 should accelerate faster than 2003 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 325 kg more than 1965 Ferrari 512 F1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 | 2003 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Ferrari | Smart |
| Model | 512 F1 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 12000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 490 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 700 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 770 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1820 mm |
