1965 Ferrari 512 F1 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ferrari 512 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 (223 HP) has 75 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ferrari 512 F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Ferrari | Holden |
| Model | 512 F1 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 700 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 770 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
