1965 Fiat Cabriolet vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Fiat Cabriolet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Fiat Cabriolet would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1965 Fiat Cabriolet. (62 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1965 Fiat Cabriolet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 455 kg more than 1965 Fiat Cabriolet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Fiat Cabriolet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Fiat Cabriolet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Fiat Cabriolet. (94 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Fiat Cabriolet.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Fiat Cabriolet | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Cabriolet | CU-X |
Year Released | 1965 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1220 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 80 L |