1965 Fiat Cabriolet vs. 2010 Nissan Note
To start off, 2010 Nissan Note is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Fiat Cabriolet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Fiat Cabriolet would be higher. At 1,386 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Note is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Note (89 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1965 Fiat Cabriolet. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Note should accelerate faster than 1965 Fiat Cabriolet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Note weights approximately 162 kg more than 1965 Fiat Cabriolet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Fiat Cabriolet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Fiat Cabriolet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Fiat Cabriolet | 2010 Nissan Note | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Cabriolet | Note |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1220 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2600 mm |