1965 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1968 Ford Mustang is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 274 more horse power than 1965 Fiat Campagnola. (61 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1965 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1965 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 469 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Fiat Campagnola. (128 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Fiat Campagnola.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Fiat Campagnola | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Campagnola | Mustang |
Year Released | 1965 | 1968 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 61 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 128 Nm | 597 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 101.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.6:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2750 mm |