1965 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis (224 HP) has 163 more horse power than 1965 Fiat Campagnola. (61 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1965 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 542 kg more than 1965 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis (373 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Fiat Campagnola. (128 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Fiat Campagnola. 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis has automatic transmission and 1965 Fiat Campagnola has manual transmission. 1965 Fiat Campagnola will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Fiat Campagnola | 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
| Make | Fiat | Mercury |
| Model | Campagnola | Grand Marquis |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 61 HP | 224 HP |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1832 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 72 L |
