1965 Fiat Grand Break vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Fiat Grand Break is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Fiat Grand Break (96 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (93 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Fiat Grand Break should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Fiat Grand Break weights approximately 275 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 142 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Fiat Grand Break | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Grand Break | Clio |
Year Released | 1965 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 43 L |