1965 Fiat Grand Break vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 1996 Proton 300 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Fiat Grand Break weights approximately 155 kg more than 1996 Proton 300.
Because 1965 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Fiat Grand Break | 1996 Proton 300 | |
Make | Fiat | Proton |
Model | Grand Break | 300 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2450 mm |