1965 Fiat Grand Break vs. 1999 Nissan Cima
To start off, 1999 Nissan Cima is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan Cima weights approximately 260 kg more than 1965 Fiat Grand Break.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Fiat Grand Break | 1999 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Grand Break | Cima |
Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1770 mm |