1965 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1965 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1965 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 100 kg more than 1965 Fiat Grand Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Fiat Grand Break. (142 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Fiat Grand Break | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Fiat | Lancia |
Model | Grand Break | Nea |
Year Released | 1965 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2590 mm |