1965 Ford Anglia vs. 1987 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1987 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 1,270 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Nissan Pulsar (60 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1965 Ford Anglia. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Anglia.
Because 1965 Ford Anglia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Anglia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Nissan Pulsar (102 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Ford Anglia. (70 Nm). This means 1987 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Ford Anglia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Anglia | 1987 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Anglia | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 1270 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2440 mm |
