1965 Ford Corsair vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1965 Ford Corsair is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,663 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Ford Corsair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Corsair (76 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Corsair should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 90 kg more than 1965 Ford Corsair.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Corsair. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Ford Corsair (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1965 Ford Corsair will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Corsair | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Corsair | Cedric |
Year Released | 1965 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1663 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2540 mm |