1965 Ford Corsair vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1966 Mercury Cougar is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Corsair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Corsair would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1965 Ford Corsair. (97 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Corsair. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 331 kg more than 1965 Ford Corsair. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Corsair | 1966 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Corsair | Cougar |
Year Released | 1965 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4728 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1031 kg | 1362 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2830 mm |