1965 Ford Corsair vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue
To start off, 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Corsair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Corsair would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 1375 kg more than 1965 Ford Corsair.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Corsair | 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Corsair | Camargue |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1663 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 104.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77.6 mm | 99.1 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 2355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3050 mm |
