1965 Ford Corsair vs. 1975 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1975 Triumph 2000 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Corsair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Corsair would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Triumph 2000 (83 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1965 Ford Corsair. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Corsair. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 265 kg more than 1965 Ford Corsair. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1975 Triumph 2000 (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Ford Corsair. (114 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1975 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Ford Corsair.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Corsair | 1975 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Corsair | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1663 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 83 HP |
| Torque | 114 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |
