1965 Ford Corsair vs. 1983 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1983 Plymouth Reliant is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Corsair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Corsair would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Plymouth Reliant weights approximately 155 kg more than 1965 Ford Corsair.
Because 1965 Ford Corsair is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Corsair. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Corsair | 1983 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | Ford | Plymouth |
| Model | Corsair | Reliant |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1663 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2260 mm |
