1965 Ford Corsair vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Corsair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Corsair would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1965 Ford Corsair. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Corsair.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Ford Corsair. (135 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Ford Corsair. 2010 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1965 Ford Corsair has manual transmission. 1965 Ford Corsair will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Corsair | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Corsair | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1663 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
