1965 Ford Corsair vs. 2011 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Corsair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Corsair would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP) has 245 more horse power than 1965 Ford Corsair. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Corsair.
Because 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Corsair. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 586 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Ford Corsair. (114 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Ford Corsair.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Corsair | 2011 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Corsair | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1663 cc | 4367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 311 HP |
Torque | 114 Nm | 700 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2891 mm |