1965 Ford Cortina vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (89 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1965 Ford Cortina. (49 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Cortina.
Because 1965 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Cortina | 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cortina | Carisma |
Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |