1965 Ford Cortina vs. 1999 Nissan Cima
To start off, 1999 Nissan Cima is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan Cima weights approximately 695 kg more than 1965 Ford Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Cortina | 1999 Nissan Cima | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Cortina | Cima |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 835 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
