1965 Ford Cortina vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,374 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1965 Ford Cortina. (49 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 635 kg more than 1965 Ford Cortina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Cortina | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Cortina | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2374 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 835 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 59 L |
