1965 Ford Cortina vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1965 Ford Cortina.
Because 1965 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Cortina | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Cortina | 3 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 83.6 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 835 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 55 L |