1965 Ford Cortina vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1965 Ford Cortina. (49 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Cortina.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Cortina | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Cortina | Raider |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 3704 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 83 L |
