1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1943 Peugeot 202
To start off, 1965 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1943 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1943 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 190 kg more than 1943 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Mustang | 1943 Peugeot 202 | |
| Make | Ford | Peugeot |
| Model | Mustang | 202 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1943 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1133 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 30 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2460 mm |
