1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1944 Renault Juva
To start off, 1965 Ford Mustang is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Renault Juva would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1944 Renault Juva. (24 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1944 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 306 kg more than 1944 Renault Juva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 1944 Renault Juva | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | Juva |
Year Released | 1965 | 1944 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 1003 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2360 mm |