1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1955 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 1965 Ford Mustang is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1955 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1955 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 15 kg more than 1955 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 1955 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | Mustang | Minx |
Year Released | 1965 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1265 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2370 mm |