1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1956 Ford F
To start off, 1965 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford F would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1956 Ford F. (156 HP @ 3000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford F. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford F weights approximately 881 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Mustang | 1956 Ford F | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Mustang | F |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1956 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4733 cc | 4458 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 2046 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3000 mm |
