1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1962 Mini MK I
To start off, 1965 Ford Mustang is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1962 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1962 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 360 kg more than 1962 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Mustang | 1962 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Ford | Mini |
| Model | Mustang | MK I |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2786 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2040 mm |
