1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1964 MG 1100
To start off, 1965 Ford Mustang is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 291 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 1964 MG 1100 | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | Mustang | 1100 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2380 mm |