1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1968 Volvo 120
To start off, 1968 Volvo 120 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (163 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 106 kg more than 1968 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Mustang | 1968 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Mustang | 120 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4261 cc | 1777 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2610 mm |
