1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1970 Honda 1300

To start off, 1970 Honda 1300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1970 Honda 1300. (81 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1970 Honda 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 80 kg more than 1970 Honda 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Honda 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Ford Mustang 1970 Honda 1300
Make Ford Honda
Model Mustang 1300
Year Released 1965 1970
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2786 cc 1298 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 100 HP 81 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 7000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 975 kg 895 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4150 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1500 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2200 mm