1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1970 Renault 10
To start off, 1970 Renault 10 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1970 Renault 10. (42 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1970 Renault 10. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 200 kg more than 1970 Renault 10. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Mustang | 1970 Renault 10 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Mustang | 10 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 42 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 775 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2280 mm |
