1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1972 Audi 80
To start off, 1972 Audi 80 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1972 Audi 80. (75 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1972 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 63 kg more than 1972 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Mustang | 1972 Audi 80 | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | Mustang | 80 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 912 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2550 mm |
