1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1975 Mini Clubman
To start off, 1975 Mini Clubman is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 515 kg more than 1975 Mini Clubman.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 1975 Mini Clubman | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Mustang | Clubman |
Year Released | 1965 | 1975 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2140 mm |