1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1976 Mazda 818
To start off, 1976 Mazda 818 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 114 kg more than 1976 Mazda 818. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Mustang | 1976 Mazda 818 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Mustang | 818 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4261 cc | 1272 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 68 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1002 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2320 mm |
