1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 1976 Volvo 66 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 345 kg more than 1976 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Mustang | 66 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |