1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1980 Audi 4000
To start off, 1980 Audi 4000 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 1980 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Mustang | 4000 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2550 mm |