1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | Ranger |
Year Released | 1965 | 1983 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4690 mm |