1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1984 Renault 4
To start off, 1984 Renault 4 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1984 Renault 4. (34 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1984 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 280 kg more than 1984 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 1984 Renault 4 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | 4 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2410 mm |