1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1988 Renault Megane
To start off, 1988 Renault Megane is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Renault Megane (250 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Mustang | 1988 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Mustang | Megane |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1988 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4261 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 250 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
